This post was provided to Pet Guardian Angels of America by Matthew Finnighan
Photo by Pexels
Should public schools have a mandatory course in pet care?
Having a pet requires to possess lots of knowledge regarding the proper care of a pet, its menu, schedule of activities, and overall approach to different people. As a result, there have been long-lasting debates considering schools’ obligations to conduct a course in pet care. One of the reasons to implement such a course is to give knowledge to students on how to train a pet with basic things so that it will be more adapted to life.
However, one may find such a piece of information on the web, simply googling persuasive speech about dogs, so that plenty of time will be saved and there will be no need to load yourself with additional courses. However, it is tough to answer unambiguously whether public schools should have a required course in pet care. Upon further examination of the question, it becomes evident for our team that systems of learning should not have compulsory subjects regarding pet care, and down below, we explained why.
Tons of Required Courses
First and foremost, students have lots of obligatory subjects, which make their life hectic and bustling. Sometimes one is unable even to take a breath between classes, so having one more subject in the curriculum will not only load students’ schedules but also can affect on graduate’s academic progress.
Moreover, it may well happen that a youngster participates in some college sports league, so this case makes the obligation of having a course in pet care even more beyond the bounds of possibility. Many students already have chosen elective subjects regarding their field of interest except for the core ones, so better not to turn their life into a bigger mess.
There are More Substantial Courses
Indisputably we are not trying to say that proper pet care is an inessential thing. What is more, cats and dog owners would agree that the right care is narrowly presented in the country.
However, it would be reasonable to construct a list of subjects, which would be able to be chosen by a graduate. For instance, nowadays, schools are lacking in essential life know-how education (primary and world history, human anatomy, biology, sex education, planning; all these tend to be sternly fragile aspects in contemporary public education).
For example, how many of our students know how to deal with taxes? Taxes are not something we can choose or reject; it is a natural order of things, e.g., inescapable. But pets are, how rude it could not sound. We are not obliged to have pets at home, such a decision may come spontaneously, yet it is voluntary, you are not pressured to have a cat or dog at home. So, in our humble opinion, there are way more significant lectures, which are going to be useful in daily life.
Make It Voluntary
Pretty much the same meaning as the previous heading, but honestly, why should it be compulsory? There are definitely a plethora of youngsters who have an interest in connecting their lives with pets, for example, zoologist, animal behaviorist/trainer, animal control officer, etc. Still, in the global scope, the percentage of such students who are willing to become a pet carer is meager. As follows, not everyone needs to know it, so there is no apparent reason to make in compulsory.
Furthermore, making a course in pet care optional, we can ease the life of allergic people as well as those who do not express sympathy to pets. There is no reason for those students to be pushed to attend classes in pet care. Overall, it should be their responsibility, because you never know what can happen during the class and making a teacher unwillingly answerable for such students would be a half-baked idea, which will create lots of second thoughts regarding the course, time-consuming, resources, and financing for schools. Plus, we cannot expect a regular school educator to be well-rounded about pet care or whatsoever. If the course is included, schools need external professionals to teach, which demands finances.
Another question that torments us is the syllabus of the course. Assuming that the course will be conducted once a week per year, what would schools teach, and how would they assess students who select pet care as an optional subject? Considering the fact that sixty hours of the course annually seem to be a substantial amount of time, in contrast, dare we say that in sixty hours one may obtain a strong knowledge in accounting and be evaluated due to understandable mark sheet.
All in all, we should say that such a course does not have to be the responsibility of public schools. It would be way better if a variety of rescue organizations managed and organized it so that it could be conducted in more favorable conditions using suits, proper experience, and so on.
Matthew Finnighan is a professional content writer at EssayShark. He aims to supply quality and unique content on the basis of humans’ need. He is happy to share his experience in writing, education, and self-development in his publications. If you are interested in writing, you can find Matthew on Twitter or Facebook